Skip to main content
< All Topics
You are here:

Respect Builds Reputation (20260813)

Professional instructors recognize that respecting intellectual property is about more than following the law—it’s about honoring creativity, building trust, and strengthening the instructor community. This session explores how attribution, permissions, originality, and professional courtesy contribute to a reputation of integrity.

Professionalism in Practice Series


  • Have you ever created something you hoped others would respect?
  • When do you think attribution is appropriate?
  • How do you decide whether something is inspiration, adaptation, or copying?

Talking Points

Intellectual Property Is More Than a Legal Concept

Copyrights, trademarks, and attribution each serve different purposes, but they all reflect respect for another person’s creative work. Understanding these differences helps you make thoughtful professional decisions.

Copyright protects the work someone creates. It applies to original expressions such as written materials, presentations, worksheets, photographs, videos, graphics, course content, and other creative works. Copyright is essentially about ownership and permission: just because you can access, download, share, or learn from something does not necessarily mean you have the right to reproduce, distribute, modify, or repurpose it.

Trademark protects the identity associated with a source. This can include names, logos, slogans, product or program names, or other distinctive branding used to identify the provider of a product or service. In this context, trademark is about avoiding confusion about identity, affiliation, or endorsement. Using someone else’s brand in a way that makes your offering appear connected to, approved by, or produced by them can become an intellectual-property issue even when you haven’t copied their actual content.

Attribution is about giving appropriate credit. Unlike copyright and trademark, attribution isn’t always a legal requirement. It is often an ethical and professional practice. If someone else’s idea, framework, research, technique, or teaching approach influenced your work, acknowledging the source recognizes their contribution—even when what you are using isn’t protected by copyright.

The law establishes boundaries and professional integrity influences how we behave in all the territory between those boundaries.

Copyright asks: Do I have the right to use this work?
Trademark asks: Could my use create confusion about whose work or brand this is?
Attribution asks: Have I appropriately acknowledged where this came from?

Sharing About the Game
Basic strategies, observations, and principles that naturally come from playing mah jongg
No, attribution is not necessary.
Sharing an Instructor’s Teaching
A distinctive way someone has organized, explained, demonstrated, or taught a concept
Yes, attribution should be given.
Sharing Recognizable Intellectual Property
A named framework, method, model, exercise, terminology, or distinctive system created by someone else
Absolutely, attribution should be given.

Originality Begins with Your Perspective

Your experiences, examples, teaching style, and personality are what make your work valuable. Rather than asking how closely you can recreate someone else’s idea, ask how you can contribute something uniquely your own.

Dream. Ask yourself, what could this become? Imagine the possibilities without immediately worrying about whether they are practical or how you would make them happen.

Re-engineer. Look at something that already exists and ask, how could this work better? Examine the process, structure, or individual parts and redesign them to solve a problem or improve the experience.

Re-imagine. Ask, what if we approached this differently? Consider changing the audience, purpose, format, setting, sequence, or overall experience.

Combine. Ask, what could I bring together? Connect ideas, methods, tools, or experiences that haven’t traditionally been used together.

Adapt. Ask, how could this work for my community? Take an existing concept and thoughtfully reshape it for a different learner, situation, or need.

Experiment. Ask, what happens if I try this? Make a small change, see what happens, learn from the results, and continue refining.

Event Planning Using ChatGPT Example

Professional Courtesy Goes Beyond the Rules

Not every situation is governed by copyright law. Sometimes the most professional choice is simply to ask permission, give credit, or acknowledge the work that inspired you.

Fair Use

Fair use allows us to use portions of someone else’s copyrighted work in certain circumstances without asking permission. It doesn’t mean that anything is fair game as long as we give credit or use it for teaching.

To determine whether a use might be fair, four basic factors are considered:

Purpose and Use
How the material is being used, including whether something new is being added through commentary, criticism, teaching, or another purpose rather than simply copying the original.

Type of Work
The nature of the original material, including whether it is primarily factual or highly creative and original.

Amount Used
How much of the original work is being used and whether the portion taken is reasonable for the intended purpose.

Impact on the Creator
Whether the new use could replace the original or reduce the creator’s ability to sell, license, or otherwise benefit from their work.

Trust Is Built Through Everyday Decisions

Students and fellow instructors notice how you conduct yourself. Small choices about attribution, collaboration, and respecting others’ work contribute to a reputation that grows over time.

Strong Communities Celebrate Creativity

A healthy instructor community encourages innovation while respecting others’ contributions. When instructors support one another rather than compete through imitation, everyone benefits.


Activity

Not every professional decision has a clear right-or-wrong answer. Many situations fall into gray areas where legal, ethical, and professional considerations may not always align. As instructors, we often learn by observing others, gathering ideas, and adapting what we discover—but how we do that matters.

As you work through each scenario, think beyond whether something is simply allowed. Consider how your decisions affect your reputation, your relationships with fellow instructors, and the trust your students place in you.

For each example, reflect on:

  • How might this be perceived by others?
  • What are the potential consequences—for you, the original creator, and the instructor community?
  • What would demonstrate professionalism, respect, and integrity?

The goal of this activity is not to memorize rules. It is to develop the judgment and habits that help you build a respected teaching practice while contributing positively to the profession.

How might this be perceived?

The original instructor might think, “My branding is being imitated.”

Other instructors might think, “Those workshops sound almost identical.”

Students might think, “These instructors are connected.”

You might think, “Titles can’t be owned.”

Potential Consequences

  • Creates confusion in the marketplace
  • Weakens your own brand identity
  • May damage professional relationships
  • Can create trademark concerns if protected
  • Misses an opportunity to develop original branding

Professional Alternative
Choose a title that reflects your own teaching style and value proposition. If another title inspires you, ask yourself what makes it effective and create something uniquely your own.

How might this be perceived?

The original instructor might think, “My teaching system has been appropriated.”

Other instructors might think, “That framework sounds familiar.”

Students might think, “This is the instructor’s original method.”

You might think, “I’m simply teaching good ideas.”

Potential Consequences

  • Diminishes trust
  • Overlooks another creator’s contribution
  • Blurs ownership of original teaching systems
  • Limits the development of your own methodology

Professional Alternative
Develop your own framework or acknowledge the source if you’re intentionally teaching someone else’s model.

How might this be perceived?

The event organizer might think, “My event has been recreated.”

Other instructors might think, “This feels very familiar.”

Participants might think, “These events are basically the same.”

You might think, “I improved on the idea.”

Potential Consequences

  • Reduces your originality
  • Can strain professional relationships
  • Makes your events less distinctive
  • Discourages innovation

Professional Alternative
Learn from successful event design while creating an experience that reflects your own objectives, audience, and teaching philosophy.

How might this be perceived?

The creator might think, “My work is being used without my consent.”

Other instructors might think, “That image belongs to someone else.”

Students might think, “The presenter created or owns the image.”

You might think, “It’s just one picture.”

Potential Consequences

  • Copyright concerns
  • Loss of professional credibility
  • Damaged relationships
  • Misrepresentation of ownership

Professional Alternative
Create your own visuals, obtain permission, purchase licensed images, or use content that is clearly available for reuse.

How might this be perceived?

The original instructor might think, “Someone is trading on my brand.”

Other instructors might think, “Those names are easy to confuse.”

Students might think, “These businesses are connected.”

You might think, “It’s slightly different so it’s ok.”

Potential Consequences

  • Marketplace confusion
  • Trademark issues
  • Damage to your professional reputation
  • Loss of trust within the instructor community

Professional Alternative

Build a brand that is unmistakably your own. Original branding is more memorable and strengthens your long-term identity.

How might this be perceived?

The creator might think, “My work is being distributed without permission.”

Other instructors might think, “This isn’t fair to the person who created it.”

Recipients might think, “Sharing purchased resources is normal.”

You might think, “I’m just being helpful.”

Potential Consequences

  • Lost revenue for the creator
  • Violation of licensing or terms of use
  • Reduced incentive for future resource development
  • Erosion of trust within the profession

Professional Alternative
Encourage others to purchase their own copy or ask the creator whether group licensing, volume pricing, or organizational use is available.

Reflections

  • Which scenario challenged your thinking the most?
  • How do your decisions contribute to trust within the instructor community?
  • What does respecting another instructor’s work look like in practice?
  • How can you continue developing your own voice while learning from others?

My Professional Practice Commitment

Professional leadership is demonstrated through the choices we make every day. Before you leave today’s session, identify one action you will intentionally put into practice.

One way I will better respect the work of others is:

One way I will strengthen the originality of my own work is:

One professional habit I will intentionally practice moving forward is:

Respect Builds Reputation (20260813)